Mejora tus textos con el corrector de gramática y ortografía de Diglot.ai. Ideal para profesionales y académicos, nuestra herramienta corrige errores de gramática y mejora el estilo, para que tus documentos queden impecables y sin errores.
French and English share thousands of words, which is exactly why French speakers keep making the same ten mistakes: "I am agree", "I have 30 years", "depend of", false friends like actually, and French-shaped spellings such as adress. Here is each pattern with the fix.
Fifteen sentences, some correct and some not. Decide which are comma splices, fused sentences or perfectly fine, then check the answers and the two-question test that settles any case.
Three different answers to one question: detectors do not care that it was Grammarly, some university policies name it explicitly, and students have been penalised. What matters is the function you used — spellcheck and rewrite are not the same act. Sourced, dated, and checked against the vendors own documentation.
Mandarin has no articles, no plural endings, and verbs that never change form — so Chinese speakers make a predictable set of English mistakes. Here are the nine biggest ones, from missing articles to "open the light", each with a clear fix.
Japanese has no articles, no plural marking, and drops subjects freely — so Japanese speakers make a predictable set of English mistakes. Here are the nine biggest ones, from missing articles to katakana false friends, each with a clear fix.
Portuguese drops subjects, uses ter (have) for age and hunger, requires double negatives, and shares hundreds of false friends with English — so Portuguese speakers make a predictable set of English mistakes. Here are the nine biggest ones, each with a clear fix.
Russian has no articles, no present perfect, and a free word order — so Russian speakers make a predictable set of English mistakes. Here are the ten biggest ones, from missing articles to "I feel myself fine", written by a Russian speaker who has made every single one of them.
Spanish is close enough to English to trust — and that trust creates a predictable set of mistakes. Here are the nine biggest ones, from "I have 25 years" and "is important that" to false friends like actualmente and asistir, each with a clear fix.
Vietnamese verbs never change form, nouns take no plural -s, and adjectives work without "to be" — so Vietnamese speakers make a predictable set of English mistakes. Here are the nine biggest ones, from "Yesterday I go" to "She very beautiful", each with a clear fix.
Runglish is the systematic blend of Russian and English: missing articles, "I very like it", calques like "make a photo", false friends like magazine and fabric. A guide to the classic patterns, why each one happens, and the targeted fix for every habit — from a founder who writes Runglish natively.
A cloud grammar checker receives everything you let it check — often the whole document, and with a browser extension, most of what you type anywhere. Here is a seven-question privacy checklist plus a safe workflow for visa letters, NDA client work, and unpublished research.
Concrete Flesch Reading Ease targets for the three texts ESL writers produce most — IELTS/TOEFL essays (45–60), journal abstracts (30–45), and business email (60–70) — with before/after rewrites and exact score deltas showing why simpler English scores higher.
Arabic has no indefinite article, no present-tense "to be", and connects clauses with one repeated "and" — so Arabic speakers make a predictable set of English mistakes. Here are the ten biggest ones, each with a clear fix.
Hindi has no articles, uses postpositions, and handles "since/for" and stative verbs differently — so Hindi speakers make a predictable set of English mistakes. Here are the ten biggest, with the difference between a real error and an Indian English feature.
Transition words are the connective tissue of academic English — they turn a list of sentences into an argument. Here is a function-organized toolbox of idiomatic connectors, the two ESL failure modes, and the punctuation rules that trip up even advanced writers.
Korean is SOV, has no articles, and drops subjects freely — so Korean speakers make a predictable set of English mistakes. Here are the ten biggest ones, from missing articles to Konglish, each with a clear fix.
Passive voice is not always wrong. Learn what each voice is, how to spot passive, and exactly when to use active or passive in academic writing.
If your first language has no articles, a/an/the feels like guesswork. Here is a clear decision system, a quick reference table, and a practice list with answers.
Spell out small numbers, never start a sentence with a numeral, and avoid all-numeric dates. A practical guide to number, date, and time conventions ESL writers get wrong.
Your punctuation habits travel with you from your first language. Here are the quotation marks, separators, spaces and commas that quietly mark your English as non-native — and the fixes.
Fragments and run-ons are the two opposite sentence-boundary errors that flag ESL writing. Learn to spot both and the five clean ways to fix a run-on.
Use Diglot's AI grammar checker to fix grammar, punctuation, spelling, and clarity issues while you write in English.
Learn how Diglot helps non-native speakers solve English grammar, spelling, paraphrasing, and translation challenges.
En la era digital, escribir de forma clara y correcta es más crucial que nunca. El corrector de gramática y ortografía de Diglot.ai está diseñado para garantizar ambas cosas. Esta herramienta avanzada está diseñada para detectar y corregir errores gramaticales, faltas de ortografía e imprecisiones de puntuación en tiempo real, mejorando la calidad de tu escritura.
Tanto si redactas trabajos académicos, correos profesionales o entradas de blog atractivas, nuestra herramienta te apoya ofreciendo sugerencias y correcciones en tiempo real que elevan la legibilidad y la profesionalidad de tu texto. Diglot.ai utiliza tecnología de vanguardia para ofrecer correcciones basadas en el contexto que van más allá de las comprobaciones básicas de gramática: no solo detecta errores, sino que también sugiere mejoras de estilo acordes con el tono y la intención de tu escritura.
¿Listo para ponerlo en práctica? Prueba la herramienta de Diglot →
Redacta, refina y reescribe en inglés con una IA pensada para hablantes no nativos.
Traduce, compara y edita textos en varios idiomas dentro de un único flujo de escritura.
Detecta problemas de gramática, ortografía y puntuación mientras escribes en inglés.
Reescribe frases, mejora la fluidez y mantén claro tu significado original.
Recuento en directo de palabras, caracteres, oraciones y tiempo de lectura mientras escribes.
Marca falsos cognados de tu idioma que superan los correctores pero cambian tu significado.
Transforma tus borradores bilingües en inglés pulido con un flujo de escritura integrado.
According to empirical literature, peer feedback is demonstrably effective for improving second language (L2) composition, particularly for structural content revisions.
Según las fuentes presentadas, la retroalimentación entre pares es eficaz para mejorar la escritura en una segunda lengua (L2), especialmente para la revisión del contenido del texto y no para la corrección de errores lingüísticos específicos. Un metaanálisis de 2023 demostró que la retroalimentación tiene un mayor impacto en las revisiones que en las nuevas composiciones [2, 3] . La eficacia de la retroalimentación entre pares también aumenta cuando los estudiantes disponen de más tiempo para escribir y cuando las actividades de retroalimentación se desarrollan durante un período más prolongado [3] . Además de las mejoras inmediatas en el texto, esta práctica también puede fomentar el desarrollo de la autonomía, la motivación y la autoeficacia de los estudiantes [1] .
A 2023 meta-analysis published in TESOL Quarterly found that peer feedback was more effective for improving the content of a student's writing than for correcting language-specific elements like lexis and grammar [2, 3] . The analysis also showed that peer feedback resulted in greater effects on revisions of existing drafts compared to its effect on entirely new compositions [2, 3] . This suggests that peer feedback is a valuable tool for the revision stage of the writing process, especially for developing ideas and structure.
The same 2023 meta-analysis identified conditions that increase the positive impact of peer feedback. Moderator analyses revealed that there were larger effect sizes, indicating greater effectiveness, when students were given more time for writing . The effectiveness also increased when the “treatments,” or periods of implementing peer feedback, were longer [3] .
Peer feedback may contribute to L2 writing improvement indirectly by fostering positive learner attributes. The process of having learners critique their peers’ writing gives them agency, which can enhance their autonomy, self-efficacy, and motivation. These psychological and motivational factors may, in turn, have a positive effect on their L2 writing and overall learning [1] .
The topic of peer feedback in L2 writing has been a subject of considerable research. A 2016 meta-analysis of peer review in academic contexts examined 24 empirical cohorts to assess longitudinal gains and structural retention.
Translate selection or the whole document.
Show popups while typing and hovering. Right-click translation is always available.
According to the sources presented, peer feedback is effective for improving second language (L2) writing, especially for revising text content rather than correcting specific linguistic errors. A 2023 meta-analysis showed that feedback has a greater impact on revisions than on new compositions [2, 3]. The effectiveness of peer feedback also increases when students have more time for writing and when feedback activities occur over a longer period [3]. In addition to immediate text improvements, this practice can also foster students' autonomy, motivation, and self-efficacy [1].
Select from 50 built-in skills or give custom instructions.
I evaluated the meta-analysis section. I sharpened the claims comparing revisions to new compositions, removed two passive hedges, and strengthened the evidence synthesis.
Maintains parallel gerund construction with subsequent review clause.
Removes filler phrase to improve academic authority and pace.
Specifies academic domain to align with psycholinguistics literature.
Cryptographically signed evidence of writing process, telemetry and research grounding.
A 2023 meta-analysis published in TESOL Quarterly determined that peer feedback yielded greater improvements in the content of student writing than in language-specific elements such as lexis and grammar [2, 3].
According to a 2023 meta-analysis in TESOL Quarterly, peer feedback proved more efficacious for enhancing substantive writing content than for correcting linguistic features [2, 3].
Jump-start your draft with structured, proven outlines.
Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion structure with citation placeholders.
Thematic matrix comparing conflicting studies, methodology, and theoretical frameworks.
