Press kit

For journalists, podcast bookers, and partner organizations covering AI-detection bias, ESL writing, and academic-integrity due process. Direct contact, founder bio, logo files, and source-cited claims below.

Press contact
press@diglot.ai
We reply within 24 hours during the working week.

About Diglot

One-line description

Diglot is a bilingual writing tool that defends real writers from AI-detection bias — built for ESL students, grad students, and professionals whose careful, formal English looks like AI to detectors.

Paragraph description

Diglot.ai is a writing platform purpose-built for non-native English speakers who face structural bias from AI-detection tools. Founded in 2023 by Alex Zhovnir, an Estonia-based founder who experienced the «flagxiety» problem firsthand, Diglot combines a connected workspace (drafting, translation, grammar review, paraphrasing, originality checks) with a forthcoming Authorship Certificate — a cryptographically-signed, append-only record of the writing process itself. The company\'s position: AI detectors don\'t actually detect AI; they detect linguistic patterns that systematically disadvantage ESL writers. Diglot\'s product makes building authorship evidence mechanical so that real writers can prove what they actually wrote.

Fast facts

Founded
2023
Founder
Alex Zhovnir (Estonia OÜ)
Headquarters
Estonia (remote)
Pricing
$0 free · $19/mo Spark · $29/mo Pro
Stage
Pre-beta · beta launch 2026
Funding
Bootstrapped / founder-funded

Key claims with sources

Every claim below is anchored in a primary source. We do not invent statistics; if you spot a number on this site without a citation we want to know. Email press@diglot.ai.

  1. 01

    False AI-detection accusations are now in federal court

    A California family submitted 1,162 pages of evidence to defend their daughter against a Turnitin 76% AI-generated flag on an English essay. The school district rejected the evidence. The family filed a federal lawsuit (Doe v. PAUSD) in May 2026.

    Source: Hoodline, May 11 2026

  2. 02

    Landmark state ruling: AI-detection-based discipline ruled "devoid of reason"

    In January 2026, New York State Supreme Court (Nassau County) ruled that Adelphi University's AI-detection-based academic penalty was "without valid basis and devoid of reason." Sanctions were rescinded and the student's record was expunged. The case is considered a precedent for due process in AI disputes.

    Source: Justia (Newby v. Adelphi)

  3. 03

    AI detectors are statistically biased against non-native English writers

    A 2023 Stanford study found GPT detectors flagged over half (61%) of essays by non-native English speakers as AI-generated. Native-written essays were flagged at a far lower rate. ESL writing — narrower vocabulary, consistent grammar, formal structure — triggers the same statistical signals AI detectors look for in machine text.

    Source: Stanford HAI / Patterns research

  4. 04

    Turnitin itself is shifting "from detection to transparency"

    In February 2026, Turnitin CEO Chris Caren publicly stated the company is shifting its product strategy "from detection to transparency" — implicit acknowledgment that punitive percentage scores were never designed as infallible verdicts. Universities including Vanderbilt, Waterloo, and MIT have rolled back AI-detection enforcement since 2023.

    Source: Turnitin Feb 2026 press release

Hero quotes

Pull-ready quotes from Alex Zhovnir on the Diglot position. Attributable: «Alex Zhovnir, founder of Diglot.ai». For tailored quotes or interviews, email press@diglot.ai.

"Building authorship evidence before an accusation is no longer paranoid. It is the new minimum for any non-native English writer producing high-stakes work."

— Alex Zhovnir, founder of Diglot.ai On the post-PAUSD landscape

"The cleaner your textbook English, the more it looks like a model wrote it. That's not a calibration bug — that's the entire mechanism of how AI detectors decide what counts as human."

— Alex Zhovnir, founder of Diglot.ai On structural bias in AI detection

"We are not anti-AI. We are pro-evidence. The question is who owns the burden of proof when a real student's real essay gets flagged — and right now, the answer is: the student."

— Alex Zhovnir, founder of Diglot.ai On Diglot's position

Brand assets

Logo files for editorial use. Diglot is a registered word mark (in progress); please do not modify the lockup, alter the lime accent color, or place the logo on backgrounds that compromise legibility.

Diglot.ai logo (full lockup)
Full lockup (SVG)
Download SVG →
Diglot.ai mark only
Mark only (SVG)
Download SVG →
Diglot.ai favicon
Favicon (PNG)
Download PNG →
Diglot Black
#050507
Diglot Lime
#B8DD69
Diglot Cream (editorial)
#F5F2EB

Founder

Alex Zhovnir

Founder & CEO, Diglot.ai

Alex Zhovnir is the founder of Diglot.ai, a bilingual writing platform built for non-native English speakers. He is non-native English himself (Ukrainian first language), and the «flagxiety» problem is autobiographical — he experienced being penalized for formal English writing that triggered AI-detection signals. Prior to Diglot he worked across international companies where the gap between native and non-native English writers in high-stakes documents was a consistent structural cost. He runs Diglot from Estonia (Diglot OÜ in registration).

Direct contact: alex@diglot.ai · LinkedIn

Topics we can speak to

  • The structural bias of current AI-detection tools against ESL writers
  • Why «flagxiety» (the constant low-grade fear of being wrongly accused as AI) is becoming a generational issue for non-native English students
  • The wave of 2025-2026 legal cases against AI-detection-based academic discipline (Doe v. PAUSD, Newby v. Adelphi, Doe v. Yale)
  • The growing list of universities rolling back AI-detection enforcement (Vanderbilt, Waterloo, MIT)
  • The technical mechanics of «perplexity» and «burstiness» that make ESL writing statistically indistinguishable from AI output
  • The case for cryptographically signed authorship provenance as the answer to the «who wrote this» question
  • What writing tools owe their non-native English users in the AI-detector era